Skip to main content

Standard Tests in Corrosion

How can material damage caused by rust formation be reliably predicted before expensive components fail in practice?

This question has occupied engineers and materials researchers worldwide for decades. This article explains the most important test methods for assessing corrosion resistance and shows how modern testing techniques help to select materials optimally.

From classic methods such as the salt spray test to state-of-the-art electrochemical analysis techniques – the diversity of corrosion measurement is impressive. Standardised norms allow an international comparison of the results, which is equally important for manufacturers and users.

Anyone who understands which test method is suitable for which application can avoid costly wrong decisions. The right materials testing not only saves money but also considerably increases the safety of technical installations.

The key findings
  • Standardised test methods deliver comparable and reproducible results for different materials
  • Electrochemical techniques enable the real-time monitoring of corrosion processes on materials
  • Accelerated laboratory tests help to assess the long-term durability of components in a short time
  • Choosing the right test method depends heavily on the later field of application of the material
  • Modern measurement techniques capture erosion-corrosion damage under realistic conditions
  • International norms guarantee the worldwide comparability of test results
  • Corrosion protection through targeted materials testing prevents billions in damage in industry every year
Description of the image content

The salt spray test – the classic among test methods

When it comes to testing the durability of coatings, there is no way around the salt spray test. This proven method simulates aggressive environmental conditions in the laboratory and delivers valuable insights into the corrosion resistance of a wide range of materials. The salt spray test is one of the most frequently used accelerated corrosion tests worldwide.

The method has established itself over decades as a reliable tool. It enables manufacturers and quality inspectors to obtain meaningful results within a relatively short time. These tests form the basis for important decisions in product development and quality assurance.

How it works + setup Standardisation + procedureEvaluation + assessment

How the test chamber works and is built

A salt spray chamber is, in principle, an enclosed space in which controlled conditions prevail. The chamber generates a fine mist of salt solution that acts continuously on the test specimens. This mist simulates aggressive environments such as salty sea air or wintry road conditions with road salt.

The setup of a typical test chamber comprises several essential components. At its heart is an atomiser system that disperses the salt solution into the finest droplets. These droplets usually have a size of 1 to 10 micrometres and are evenly distributed throughout the test space.

Temperature control plays a decisive role in the reproducibility of the results. Most salt spray tests are carried out at a constant temperature of 35 degrees Celsius. A precise heating and control system ensures that this temperature remains stable throughout the entire test period.

The salt solution concentration is also precisely defined. As standard, a 5 percent sodium chloride solution is used, which corresponds roughly to the salinity of seawater. The solution is prepared in a separate container and continuously fed for atomisation.

Modern test chambers feature sophisticated distribution systems. These ensure that the salt mist is distributed evenly over all test specimens. This creates comparable conditions for each sample, regardless of its position in the chamber.

Standardisation and practical procedure

International standards ensure the comparability of test results from different laboratories. The best-known norms for the salt spray test are DIN EN ISO 9227, ASTM B117 and DIN 50021. Each norm defines specific parameters for the procedure.

DIN EN ISO 9227 distinguishes between different test methods. The neutral salt spray test (NSS) is the most widely used variant. In addition, there are the acetic acid salt spray test (AASS) and the copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray test (CASS) for special applications.

The practical procedure follows a clear sequence:

  • Preparation of the test specimens through thorough cleaning and drying
  • Positioning of the samples in the chamber at an angle of 15 to 30 degrees to the vertical
  • Preparation of the salt solution with distilled or deionised water
  • Setting the chamber temperature to the standardised value
  • Start of atomisation and continuous monitoring of the test conditions

The test duration varies considerably depending on the material and requirement. Simple coatings are often tested for 24 or 48 hours. High-quality corrosion protection systems undergo salt spray tests of 1000 hours or longer.

During the test, the most important parameters are checked regularly. These include the atomisation rate, the pH value of the collected solution and the temperature. The results are only meaningful if all parameters lie within the standardised range.

Documentation is an essential part of every salt spray test. All relevant data such as test duration, norm used, test conditions and special features are carefully recorded. These records subsequently enable a traceable evaluation.

Evaluation and assessment of the test results

After completion of the test, the test specimens are removed and carefully rinsed with water. This rinsing removes salt residues that could otherwise distort the assessment. A thorough drying at room temperature follows.

The assessment is carried out according to different criteria, depending on the material tested. For coated samples, the focus is on blistering, flaking and subsurface rusting. Metallic surfaces are examined for surface rust and pitting.

Standardised rating scales exist for classifying damage. DIN EN ISO 4628, for example, provides detailed pictorial tables for assessing coating damage. These scales typically range from 0 (no damage) to 5 (severe damage).

Rust coverage is often given as a percentage of the total area. Modern evaluation methods use digital image analysis to determine these areas objectively. This increases reproducibility and reduces subjective influences in the assessment.

The informative value of the salt spray test does, however, also have its limits. The test greatly accelerates corrosion processes and does not always correspond exactly to real operating conditions. Changing environmental influences such as dry and wet cycles are not fully reproduced.

A combination of different test methods is therefore often advisable. Salt spray tests deliver quick comparative results for different coatings or materials. For a comprehensive assessment, they should be supplemented by other methods such as outdoor weathering or cyclic corrosion tests.

Experienced testers always interpret the results in the context of the later application. A material that shows the first rust spots after 500 hours in the salt spray test can nevertheless be perfectly adequate for many indoor applications. For maritime environments, however, such results would be inadequate.

Immersion test and outdoor weathering test in practice

Two proven methods shape practical corrosion testing: the immersion test for corrosion in the laboratory and the outdoor weathering test under real conditions. Both approaches deliver important insights into material durability, but differ fundamentally in their procedure and informative value. The choice of the right method depends on the specific requirements and operating conditions of the components to be tested.

While laboratory tests enable reproducible results under controlled parameters, outdoor tests reflect the complexity of real environmental influences. Both methods complement each other ideally to obtain a complete picture of corrosion resistance.

Complete immersion in corrosive media

The immersion test for corrosion simulates conditions in which components are permanently in contact with aggressive liquids. Material samples are completely immersed in corrosive media and observed over defined periods of time. This method is particularly suitable for components such as tanks, pipelines or maritime underwater structures.

Typical test media include salt solutions, acids, alkalis or special chemical compositions. The selection is based on the later operating conditions of the material. A sample for the maritime sector, for example, is immersed in artificial seawater.

The advantages of this method are obvious:

  • Fast results through accelerated corrosion processes
  • Complete control over all test parameters
  • High reproducibility of the test conditions
  • Cost-efficient implementation in the laboratory
  • Comparability of different materials under identical conditions

However, the test only reflects a section of reality. Changing environmental conditions, mechanical loads or UV radiation remain unconsidered. For a comprehensive assessment, these factors must be examined separately.

Natural weathering as the master tester

The outdoor weathering test exposes material samples to actual environmental conditions. Over months or years, the samples are exposed at selected sites. Rain, sun, temperature changes and atmospheric pollutants act together on the material.

The choice of site plays a decisive role in the informative value of the results. Coastal regions with salty air, industrial conurbations with pollutant exposure or alpine altitudes with intense UV radiation offer different test conditions. Many companies use standardised test fields at various geographical positions.

The samples are typically mounted at defined angles to the horizontal. An inclination angle of 45 degrees has proven itself in practice. This arrangement enables natural water drainage and represents many real installation situations.

Essential features of the outdoor weathering test:

  1. Realistic simulation of the actual operating conditions
  2. Recording of complex interactions between various environmental factors
  3. Long-term data on material durability
  4. Validation of laboratory results under practical conditions
  5. Consideration of seasonal fluctuations and extreme weather events

The challenge lies in the considerable time required. Meaningful results often require multi-year exposure times. In addition, the conditions cannot be controlled, which makes comparability more difficult.

In practice, both methods complement each other optimally. Immersion tests provide quick orientation in material selection. Outdoor weathering tests then confirm long-term durability under real conditions. This combination ensures both efficiency and practical relevance in corrosion testing.

ASTM norms and international test standards

Standardisation creates transparency and comparability in corrosion testing, which is equally important for manufacturers and test laboratories. Without uniform standards, an objective comparison of test results from different laboratories would hardly be possible. The internationally recognised norm systems ensure that test methods are carried out reproducibly and traceably.

Three major norm systems dominate corrosion testing worldwide: ASTM norms from the USA, DIN standards from Germany and ISO regulations as the international reference. Each system has its own strengths and areas of application. The choice of the appropriate norm considerably influences the recognition of the results in different markets.

ASTM corrosion tests

Important ASTM corrosion tests

The American Society for Testing and Materials has been developing test standards for almost all material groups for over a century. Its ASTM corrosion tests enjoy worldwide recognition and are also frequently used as a reference outside the USA. The norms are characterised by precise specifications and practical applicability.

The most important standards include ASTM B117 for the salt spray test, which serves worldwide as the basis for accelerated corrosion tests. ASTM G31 describes laboratory immersion tests and provides detailed instructions for sample preparation and evaluation. For cyclic corrosion tests in the salt spray test, ASTM G85 offers various test cycles with changing conditions.

Electrochemical test methods are dealt with in ASTM G59, which governs potentiostatic and potentiodynamic polarisation tests. ASTM G1 is dedicated to the preparation and cleaning of samples before and after corrosion tests. Each norm contains clear specifications for equipment, chemicals, test parameters and reporting.

A major advantage of the ASTM norms lies in their level of detail and flexibility. They often offer several test variants for different applications. The norms are regularly revised and adapted to the current state of the art. This guarantees their continued relevance in practice.

DIN and ISO standards

DIN and ISO standards in comparison

The German Institute for Standardisation develops test standards that are widely used in Europe. Many DIN norms have been harmonised with ISO standards to ensure international compatibility. The designation DIN EN ISO indicates that a norm is valid at all three levels.

ISO 9227 corresponds largely to DIN 50021 and also deals with salt spray tests. It is the international counterpart to ASTM B117 and is used in particular in the European and Asian regions. The test parameters are very similar; minor differences exist in the evaluation criteria.

DIN standards often place particular emphasis on precise measurement specifications and documentation requirements. The ISO norms strive for global applicability and take various regional conditions into account. Both systems complement each other well and are frequently applied in parallel.

For atmospheric corrosion tests, ISO 9223 offers a classification of corrosion loads in different environments. DIN EN ISO 8407 describes methods for removing corrosion products from samples. These harmonised standards considerably facilitate the international exchange of test results.

A key difference lies in availability and language. DIN norms are available in German and take specific European requirements into account. ISO standards are published in English and French and aim for worldwide acceptance.

Norm selection

Selecting the right norm for specific requirements

The decision in favour of a particular norm system should be based on several factors. The most important aspect is the target market for the product to be tested. Components for the North American market are usually tested according to ASTM corrosion tests, while European products require DIN or ISO certifications.

The type of material also plays an important role in norm selection. Some standards are developed specifically for steel, others for aluminium or coatings. ASTM, for example, offers separate norms for different metal groups and surface treatments. A careful examination of applicability is therefore essential.

Customer requirements and industry standards often dictate which norms must be used. The automotive industry has developed its own test specifications based on ISO or ASTM standards. Legal regulations can also influence the choice of norm, especially for safety-relevant components.

The intended operating conditions must be taken into account in the selection. Special test protocols exist for marine environments, others for industrial atmospheres. Climatic conditions at the place of use should be reproduced in the test as realistically as possible. This significantly increases the informative value of the test results.

In practice, a combination of different standards is often advisable. A salt spray test according to ISO 9227 can be supplemented by electrochemical measurements according to ASTM G59. This multiple safeguarding provides more comprehensive insights into the corrosion behaviour.

Test laboratories should have accreditations for the relevant norms. Competence in the correct application of the standards is just as important as the technical equipment. Sound advice helps to find the optimal combination of norms for each specific test task.

Standard tests in corrosion – long-term studies and measurement methods

While short-term tests provide initial insights, advanced test methods and monitoring systems enable in-depth insights into long-term corrosion processes. Especially for materials that are intended to remain in use for years or decades, accelerated tests are not always sufficient. This is where specialised long-term studies and modern measurement techniques come into play, continuously recording and evaluating data.

The combination of systematic planning and advanced technology creates new possibilities for precise predictions. This allows companies to react early and avoid costly failures. Technological development has considerably advanced corrosion research in recent years.

Planning long-term corrosion studies correctly

Planning long-term corrosion studies requires considerably more effort than preparing standard tests. Tests can extend over months or even years. A careful design is therefore essential to obtain meaningful and reproducible results.

Sample preparation forms the foundation of every successful long-term study. All samples must be pre-treated identically to ensure comparability. Surface cleanliness, defined dimensions and documented initial states are critical factors here.

Constant exposure conditions over the entire test period are particularly important. Temperature, humidity and the chemical composition of the environment must be precisely controlled. Even small fluctuations can distort the results and render long-term studies worthless.

Documentation plays a central role in long-term corrosion studies. Every inspection, every measurement and every observation must be recorded without gaps. Structured test logs and digital data acquisition systems that automatically log time stamps and environmental parameters help with this.

Statistical considerations regarding the number of samples must not be neglected. A sufficient number of samples ensures the informative value of the results. Experts recommend at least three to five identical samples per test configuration in order to detect random deviations.

Periodic interim evaluations make it possible to identify trends at an early stage. These inspections should take place at fixed intervals without damaging the samples. Photographic documentation and non-destructive testing methods have proven their worth here.

Modern corrosion measurement and monitoring techniques

Modern corrosion measurement goes far beyond traditional weight-loss methods. Innovative electrochemical methods today enable in-situ measurements without destroying the samples. These techniques deliver real-time data and allow continuous monitoring of corrosion processes.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy has established itself as a particularly powerful tool. The method analyses how materials react to electrical signals of different frequencies. The measurement data allows conclusions to be drawn about corrosion rate and protection mechanisms.

Electrochemical noise offers another innovative approach for corrosion measurement. Spontaneous current fluctuations on the metal surface are recorded and evaluated. This technique is particularly sensitive and often detects incipient corrosion earlier than conventional methods.

High-speed chronoamperometry complements the spectrum of modern measurement techniques. It records current changes after voltage jumps with millisecond resolution. Local damage and pitting corrosion thereby become visible at an early stage.

Monitoring systems for practical application integrate several sensor technologies. They continuously monitor parameters such as corrosion potential, electrical resistance and environmental conditions. Wireless data transmission enables the remote monitoring of installations and components.

The practical benefit of these systems is particularly evident in critical infrastructures. Pipelines, bridges and offshore installations benefit from permanent condition monitoring. Maintenance work can be planned in a targeted manner before serious damage occurs.

Sensors can today be integrated directly into components or installed retrospectively. Miniaturised technology makes it possible to monitor even hard-to-reach locations. Modern systems combine corrosion measurement with data analysis and warning systems for optimal protection.

The continuous further development of these technologies opens up new perspectives for materials research and damage prevention. Artificial intelligence can increasingly interpret measurement data and make predictions. The future of corrosion monitoring will be even more precise, networked and forward-looking.

Electrochemical corrosion tests at a glance

Corrosion is at its core an electrochemical process in which electrons migrate between different areas of a material. This is precisely where electrochemical corrosion tests come in. They use this fundamental property to analyse and understand corrosion processes precisely.

In contrast to classic methods such as the salt spray test, electrochemical methods do not only capture the final result. They observe corrosion as it takes place. This capability makes them the most sensitive tools in modern corrosion research.

Electrochemical methods react even to the smallest surface changes. They often detect corrosion processes before they become visible to the naked eye. This enables early measures and precise predictions about material durability.

The most important electrochemical test methods include:

  • Potentiodynamic polarisation: The electrical potential is systematically changed to determine the corrosion rate and passivation behaviour
  • Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: Measures the resistance of protective layers and provides information about coating quality
  • Chronoamperometry: Enables time-resolved measurements of corrosion processes in real time
  • Measurement of electrochemical noise: Records spontaneous current fluctuations to detect pitting and stress corrosion cracking

Potentiodynamic polarisation is one of the most established methods. A sample is immersed in an electrolyte and its potential is gradually increased or decreased. The measurement of the flowing current shows how the material reacts under different electrochemical conditions.

This technique delivers critical parameters. These include the corrosion current density and the breakdown potential for pitting. The re-passivation kinetics can also be determined – that is, how quickly protective passive films re-form after a disturbance.

A major advantage of electrochemical corrosion tests is their versatility. They can be carried out invasively or non-invasively. Some methods work non-destructively and enable in-situ measurements on components in operation.

Practical advantages of electrochemical methods:

  1. Fast results – often within hours instead of weeks
  2. High sensitivity for early corrosion stages
  3. Mechanistic insights into corrosion processes
  4. Possibility of continuous monitoring
  5. Small sample quantities required

Modern developments further expand the possibilities. High-speed chronoamperometry detects short-term surface changes in the millisecond range. Combined techniques link electrochemical measurements with optical observation or spectroscopy.

In practice, electrochemical methods ideally complement the classic standard tests. While salt spray and outdoor weathering simulate the real load, electrochemical tests provide the scientific understanding of the mechanisms taking place.

This combination enables engineers and researchers to assess both practical durability and fundamental corrosion resistance. The result is more reliable material selections and more effective corrosion protection strategies.

Our conclusion
The right selection and execution of test methods determines the quality of the results. Standard tests in corrosion offer a broad spectrum of possibilities. From classic methods to modern analysis techniques, the right solution is available for every application.

Accelerated laboratory tests deliver quick comparative values. Outdoor weathering tests show realistic long-term data. Electrochemical methods enable detailed insights into corrosion mechanisms. Each method has its specific strengths.

Compliance with international norms such as ASTM, DIN or ISO ensures comparable results. Modern monitoring systems and sensitive measurement techniques are constantly expanding the possibilities of material characterisation. The technology is continuously evolving.

Sound knowledge of various standard tests in corrosion helps with damage prevention. Materials can be selected optimally. The service life of technical components increases through proper testing. Scientific progress and practical experience continuously improve corrosion testing. The future offers exciting developments for even more precise and efficient test methods.

Request analysis →